by widerworte
Lars
Hedegaard über die Weigerung des Westens, die islamischen Quellen des
Terrors zur Kenntnis zu nehmen und die verbreiteten Versuche, ihn
mit allen möglichen anderen "Ursachen" zu erklären, wie sozialen
Verhältnissen, Reaktion auf Imperialismus, Armut, angebliche
Diskriminierung usw. Seine Kritik der EU-Politik, die die
Massenmigration mit Moslems unentwegt als Bereicherung ausgibt, triff
vor allem auf Deutschland zu. Aber auch die USA spielen mit ihrer
OIC-konformen fatalen Meinungszensurgesetz dem Islam in die
Hände. Interessant ist die Wende der dänischen Sozialdemokratie, die er
hier zitiert, eine späte Einsicht, von der die deutsche Sozis weit
entfernt sind. Auch der von ihm hier erwähnte holländische
Bürgerprotest gegen Asylheime, die über die Köpfe der Bürger hinweg
geplant wurden, rufen in den Niederlanden nicht eine solche Verteuflung
der ausserparlamentarischen Opposition hervor, wie sie der
-gidabewegung in Deutschland entgegenschlägt.
Jihad: "All the Fault of the West!"
by Lars Hedegaard
December 26, 2015
As
long as we in the West are not prepared to take Muslims at their word
when they claim to be waging bloody jihad because it is their religious
obligation, we have no chance of repelling the current onslaught on the
West.
First to go will be the welfare states. Shrinking native populations
cannot generate enough taxes to accommodate masses of immigrants with so
few skills as to be effectively unemployable, or who do not want to
contribute to "infidel" societies. Well before mid-century, the number
of Muslims in Denmark will be large enough irreversibly to have changed
the composition and character of the country.
In the United States, a House of Representatives bill, H. Res. 569, has
been sponsored that would censor one of the few countries left with
freedom of speech. The bill, in accordance with the 10-year plan of the
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), would criminalize all
criticism of Islam, worldwide.
Will Muslim non-integration spell the end of the secular state as we
have known it? Probably. Religion – or more accurately, Islamic
ideology, which knows no distinction between religion and politics – is
on the ascendant.
It
was not supposed to have happened this way. In 1995 a number of EU
member states signed the Schengen Agreement, integrated into European
Union law in 1999. The signatory powers promised to abandon their
internal border protection in exchange for a promise by the EU
authorities that they would police Europe's external borders. Then the
EU authorities, while demanding that the Schengen states keep their
borders open, spectacularly failed to honor their part of the agreement.
There can be little doubt that the EU packed up, walked out and left
its populations to their own devices.
Sadly, their policies have achieved the exact opposite of what they
claimed to strive for. Instead of tolerance, we have witnessed division
and irreconcilable enmity between cultures and ethnicities that often
have nothing in common except a desire to squeeze as much out of the
public coffers as they can. Instead of "inclusion," Europeans have seen
exclusion, low-intensity warfare, terror, no-go zones, rape epidemics,
murder and mayhem.
Governments, parliamentary majorities and the stars of academia, the
media and the commanding heights of culture cannot have failed to notice
that their grand multicultural, Islamophile game did not produce the
results they had promised their unsuspecting publics. Yet to this day,
most of them persist in claiming that unfettered immigration from the
Muslim world and Africa is an indisputable boon to Europe.
Recently, in the wake of the so-called "refugee crisis," some of these
notables have thrown out the script and are expressing concern that
immigration is out of control. European governments are still allowing
millions of so-called refugees to cross all borders and settle anyplace.
According to the EU agency Frontex, charged with protecting Europe's
external borders, more than a million and a half illegals crossed
Europe's frontiers between January and November 2015.
Thousands of migrants cross illegally into Slovenia on foot, in this screenshot from YouTube video filmed in October 2015.
Right
now there is an ever-widening gap between the people and their rulers.
In a conference recently organized by the Danish Free Press Society to
commemorate the tenth anniversary of the famous Muhammed cartoons, the
British political analyst, Douglas Murray, noted that the European
populations are reacting to decades of lies and deception by voting for
political parties which, just a few years ago, were vilified as "racist"
and "fascist." Marine Le Pen, of the National Front party, has emerged
as a strong candidate in France's 2017 presidential election.
Perhaps the most momentous political earthquake in Europe was the
recent 180-degree about-face by the Danish Social Democratic Party. Only
a few years ago, it was a staunch proponent of Muslim immigration, and
hammered away at anyone daring to deny the "cultural enrichment" brought
about by the spread of Islam.
The leader of Denmark's Social Democratic parliamentary group, Henrik Sass Larsen MP, on December 18 wrote:
"The
massive migration and stream of refugees now coming to Europe and
Denmark are of a magnitude that challenges the fundamental premises of
our society in the near future... According to our analysis, the stark
economic consequences of the current number of refugees and immigrants
will consume all room for maneuver in public finance within a few years.
Non-Western immigrants have historically been difficult to integrate
into the labor market; the same applies to the Syrians that are now
arriving. The more, the harder, the more expensive... Finally, it is our
analysis that given our previous experience with integrating
non-Western people into our society, we are facing a social catastrophe
when it comes to handling many tens of thousands that are soon to be
channeled into society. Every bit of progress in terms of integration
will be put back to zero. ... Therefore our conclusion is clear: We will
do all we can to limit the number of non-Western refugees and
immigrants coming to the country. That is why we have gone far -- and
much farther than we had dreamed of going... We are doing this because
we will not sacrifice our welfare society in the name of
humanitarianism. For the welfare society ... is the political project of
the Social Democratic Party. It is a society built on the principles of
liberty, equality and solidarity. Mass immigration -- as we have seen
in, for example, Sweden -- will undermine ... our welfare society."
Clearly,
the Danish Social Democratic Party -- the architect of Denmark as we
have known it -- has understood that there is political capital to be
defended. It seems finally to have realized that it cannot persist in
whittling away its accomplishments if it wants to keep its dwindling
share of the votes.
One may speculate that if the Social Democratic Party means what it
says, it might have an impact among Social Democratic and Socialist
parties in other European countries.
However, as Douglas Murray also pointed out, Westerners suffer from the
notion that regardless of how many jihadis, murderers and terrorists
claim that their actions are motivated by their love of Allah, they
cannot possibly mean it. There must be some other underlying "root
cause" that the men of violence are not aware of, but which well-meaning
Westerners are keen to tell them about: old Western imperialism,
centuries of humiliation, racism, Israel, the Crusades, poverty,
exclusion, the Muhammad cartoons, etc. And, of course, that it is all
the fault of the West!
As long as we in the West are not prepared to take Muslims at their
word when they claim to be waging bloody jihad because it is their
religious obligation, we have no chance of repelling the current
onslaught on the West. The latest sighting of this shift was just this
week, in the form of a U.S. House of Representatives bill, H. Res. 569,
to censor one of the few countries left with free speech. The bill, in
accordance with the 10-year plan of the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation (OIC) to implement UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18,
would criminalize, worldwide, all criticism of Islam. [1]
As long as the authorities are unwilling to protect their own
populations from being overrun by foreigners, many of whom seem prepared
to do them harm, we are likely to see the natives take protection into
their own hands. On December 16, for instance, there was a violent
protest in the small Dutch city of Geldermalsen, as the local
authorities were trying to set up an asylum center behind the backs of
the local population. No doubt the authorities were taken aback by the
activism.
Western societies are based on an implied contract between the
sovereign and the people: The sovereign -- the king, the president, the
government -- promises to uphold law and order, protect his people from
violence and foreign encroachment and apprehend and punish criminals. In
exchange, the citizens promise not to take the law into their own
hands. It follows that if the state fails to uphold its part of this
social bargain, then the right -- indeed the obligation -- to protect
oneself, one's family, neighbors and the community, returns to the
citizens.
There was also the recent spate of asylum-house burnings in Sweden.
According to the Danish-Swedish website, Snaphanen, there have been 40
occasions during the past six months in which buildings intended to
house asylum seekers have mysteriously burned to the ground -- without
anyone being hurt or killed. None of the perpetrators has been caught;
no one has claimed responsibility. It all appears organized quite well.
Will citizen activism save Europe? Probably not. Vast areas are too far
gone to be saved. Sweden is a broken country, as pointed out by Ingrid
Carlqvist in several articles at Gatestone. By 2020, Germany may have 20
million Muslim residents.
We
are probably beyond the point where effective change can be obtained by
politics in the old sense, for the simple reason that central
authorities are not strong enough to make their writ run throughout
their national territories. This will spell the end of Europe as we know
it, and people who cannot leave, or who choose to stand and fight, will
be left to their own devices -- and quite possibly entirely new modes
of social organization.
Kommentare